|Developed in RO9 but it is not the developer.|
When something unexpected happens while you are processing your negatives, it takes a bit of time to get your head round it. This happened while I was processing a number of rolls of film in R09 and using it's special brother.
The problem has shown it's self by producing very blotchy negatives affecting two rolls of the six film developed. When this happens in a run of developing it is difficult to work out what circumstances are different enough to point a finger at.
Please bear in mind that the elimination process was written after I discovered the culprit.
|Fomapan 100 negatives developed in RO9|
Process of elimination:
- So where to start? It is fortunate that the negatives involved were not the ones processed in the RO9 special. The RO9 developed one's were. This made the investigation more straight forward in that I have a better understanding of how RO9 works.
- Was it the developer? It was made up seconds before it was used in the usual way.
- What about Stop and Fix? Both were freshly made up minuets before use. So it cannot be one of the three main players? As they are all fresh.
- OK what about the method? No difference there either I used my usual inversion sequence.
- Processing tanks? Well I did press a tank into use that I have not used in a long time because of the quantity of film that needed to be developed.
- Could that be the answer?
- Did it affect one make of film in particular? No it did not, again this could have been a fortunate coincidence in that a roll of FP4+ and Fomapan 100 show the same affect. If it had only happened to one make it could have been construed as a manufacturing fault.
- Water? It was fresh and clean and there had not been any notices to say there was a problem with the drinking water.
- That leaves wetting agent? Hold on now that points to something I noticed when I was using PMK Pyro some years ago, I had a roll of film with the same sort of pattern. I put it down to the developer which I have
Film FP4+ developed in PMK Pyro
Looking back I think when I pressed the other developing tank into use I mistakenly picked up the one I had been using for wetting agent. The resulting blotchy pattern is the result of its contamination.
|This print was made from the same contaminated|
Negatives. note no blotchy marks.
Having eliminated all the other possibilities and no matter how silly it may sound the wetting agent is the culprit in this case. It has this time affected a nearly all the frames on each film, when it happened some years ago (after checking the negatives) only certain frames showed signs of being blotchy. Which would indicate a weak contamination of the film process. This is only the second time I have had this problem in all the years I have been developing film. It just goes to show that something as innocuous as soap can cause so much trouble if it is not washed away conclusively after every processing session when added to the developing tank. My suggestion is to put wetting agent in a separate container and add the reel and film to it and not the other way round.
|This picture shows that the blotches are prominent|
In the sky but not the foreground.
When printing the affected negatives you cannot see the blotches when looking down the focus finder. Even though the contact prints show it quite clearly.
All the photographs that appear with this article were printed from the dodgy neg's. As I mentioned not all suffered the soapy demise.